All rights reserved. Image licensed for use by copyright holder David Slater, not Naruto the monkey.
In 2011 nature photographer David Slater traveled to the forests of Indonesia, where he encountered a curious crested macaque by the name of Naruto. A series of events were set in motion, that left photographers, lawyers, and animal rights activists across the globe enthralled. The resulting image, dubbed “the monkey selfie” started a fascinating court battle that finally came to a close yesterday.
The Saga Begins
Three years after David met Naruto, PETA (People For The Ethical Treatment Of Animals) argued that Naruto owned the copyright to the image. They filed a lawsuit against David, claiming that they were seeking financial control of the photograph, for Naruto’s benefit. The image had gone viral, having been picked up by several big media outlets.
“Naruto should be considered the author and copyright owner, and he shouldn’t be treated any differently from any other creator simply because he happens to not be human” – Jeff Kerr, PETA
Wikimedia Commons then published the image, alleging it was a public domain work. David continued to argue for the image to be taken down as it was his intellectual property, but to no avail. Wikimedia’s widespread posting of the image purported to be in the public domain encouraged unlicensed use and illegal exploitation and has left David without the opportunity to fairly license it’s use.
The Saga Continues
We thought the saga was finished back in 2016 when a federal judge ruled that a monkey cannot own the copyright. David and PETA then reached a partial settlement agreement that saw David donate a percentage of any income generated from the infamous snap to charities working to protect macaques in Indonesia. This did not, however, settle the matter entirely. As the ninth circuit court of appeals refused to let either party drop the case, and yesterday they delivered the conclusive blow in a debate that has continued for nearly a decade.
The Final Ruling
They unanimously decided that lawsuits cannot be filed claiming that animals have copyright to photos. The court specified that copyright can only be claimed on behalf of humans. The court also ruled that David is entitled to attorneys fee recovery. This is great news for the photographer, who has spoken openly about the huge financial impact the case has had on him. He at one point contemplated dog walking or teaching tennis as an alternative to photography.
A Statement From David Slater
In a statement posted to his Facebook page on Monday night, David spoke of his relief that his battle with PETA was over, but stated that it was never his intention to stand in the way of the progression of animal rights;
I so hope that wild animals are granted more and more fundamental rights in the future – like rights to dignity, survival, homeland, and their evolutionary privileges. They accept us as part of their landscape, with a big SMILE. We need to accept them as part of ours don’t you think? – David Slater
Buy Your Own Monkey Selfie
As copyright experts, fighting for the rights of image creators across the world we have followed this landmark case with interest. We were delighted to read David’s post last night. If you would like to support David, you can legally and properly obtain your own monkey selfie from his website here – https://www.djsphotography.co.uk/monkeyselfie.htm
If you would like to know more about copyright, and how to protect your images, you can sign up to Pixsy, and it’s free! We monitor thousands of images and partner with 26 different legal teams across the world to uphold copyright law.
About The Author: Hannah Graves
As Pixsy's Product Marketing and Community Manager, Hannah is always keen to start conversations and she loves to make connections! With years of experience working with and advocating for visual artists, she is passionate about fair pay for fair work and enjoys helping to get artists paid, and heard.
More posts by Hannah Graves